Ive been doing some covers, so this is the time for sharing them. Check them out.
Toronto 1990 Alt
Hamilton 1997
Mountain View 1997
Hope you like it ... and print it
Cheers
3 New Additions - Toronto90 / Hamilton97 / MView97
Started by
Guest_jcfuel_*
, Mar 10 2005 02:42 PM
10 replies to this topic
#2
Harmony Havoc
-
- Cover Artists
-
- 773 posts
Girls Love Metallica Best
- Location:Reno, Nevada
- Interests:Music, Art, and Metallica of course!!!
Posted 10 March 2005 - 03:14 PM
Very Nice. Great work! 
#3
franticland
-
- Cover Artists
-
- 196 posts
- Interests:Metallica Music...<br>Metallica collector <br>Bass player<br>Webdesign<br>Videogames<br>MotoGP<br>Formula1<br>....
Posted 10 March 2005 - 04:46 PM
WOW....i like your new dvd covers :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock:
#4
Kathlib the Prophet
-
- Administrators
-
- 3,119 posts
Luck. Runs. Out.
- Gender:Male
Posted 10 March 2005 - 06:18 PM
Cool covers man, they look pretty sweet. :thumbs-up: The only thing is, they're made really small and will be rather blurry when printed. The best size is 1075x720 pixels @ 100 resolution, and covers made at those sizes print perfectly on glossy photo paper. I know because I've done it.
#6
Guest_jcfuel_*
Guest_jcfuel_*
-
- Guests
-
Posted 10 March 2005 - 08:13 PM
Im more than happty that you enjoy it.
@Spawn, man i made them i that size, cause that the exact measure of the print i need to get it into the DVD case. But what i want to know is if it make them 1075X720 and when trying to print i resized, the quality will be lost?
Thanks in advance
@Spawn, man i made them i that size, cause that the exact measure of the print i need to get it into the DVD case. But what i want to know is if it make them 1075X720 and when trying to print i resized, the quality will be lost?
Thanks in advance
#7
frantik2k3
-
- Cover Artists
-
- 588 posts
The Freelancer
- Gender:Male
- Location:New Hampshire, USA
- Interests:Metallica
Posted 11 March 2005 - 01:55 AM
I'm not 100% sure, but I would guess that if you were to resize an image that is larger than what you need, the quality loss (if any) would be small. And the opposite is for a small image you are trying to make big.But what i want to know is if it make them 1075X720 and when trying to print i resized, the quality will be lost?
Man, I love that Mountain View cover! The background is great. The color scheme on the Hamilton one is awesome too. Great work man. I hope you continue to make some more covers! :thumbs-up:
[url="http://frantik2k3.metpage.org"]:: Frantik2k3 Trading & Custom Work Website ::[/url]
Proudly hosted by Metpage
[img][url][url]http://frantik2k3.metpage.org/sigs/signature13_lars2009.jpg[/url][/url][/img]
Proudly hosted by Metpage
[img][url][url]http://frantik2k3.metpage.org/sigs/signature13_lars2009.jpg[/url][/url][/img]
#8
Kathlib the Prophet
-
- Administrators
-
- 3,119 posts
Luck. Runs. Out.
- Gender:Male
Posted 11 March 2005 - 02:11 AM
Correct, if you're scaling down an image there is very little quality loss, whereas if you're stretching a cover there is significantly more quality loss. Anyway, I've tested it myself and covers made at 1075x720 pixels @ 100 resolution (instead of the web standard of 72) will print perfectly.
#9
Guest_jcfuel_*
Guest_jcfuel_*
-
- Guests
-
Posted 11 March 2005 - 02:18 PM
i figure it out yesterday, with that size and resolution, the sheet lenght is the same as what ive been working on.Correct, if you're scaling down an image there is very little quality loss, whereas if you're stretching a cover there is significantly more quality loss. Anyway, I've tested it myself and covers made at 1075x720 pixels @ 100 resolution (instead of the web standard of 72) will print perfectly.
Thanks for the tip.
Cheers
#10
Guest_masterofpuppets6115_*
Guest_masterofpuppets6115_*
-
- Guests
-
Posted 12 March 2005 - 11:11 AM
great artworks, jcfuel, great work!
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Done
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
